logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.02.17 2020가단24999
구상금 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a fire insurance contract with D as to the E-ground building in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the Plaintiff as a party to the contract (hereinafter “the subject-matter of the instant insurance”).

D leased the subject matter of the instant insurance to F, and had the F carry on the furniture manufacturing business under the trade name of “G”.

The Defendant is a household-making factory (4-dong, 1,576.66 square meters in total floor area) on the H ground adjacent to the instant insurance object in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

A company operating a defendant factory (hereinafter referred to as "the defendant factory") is the owner and occupant of the defendant factory.

B. On January 26, 2019, around 04:00 on the instant fire, a cause fire was caused inside the Defendant factory (hereinafter “instant fire”).

Accordingly, the defendant factory was discharged, and the damage was caused to the nearby factory including the subject matter of the insurance in this case.

In light of witness and CCTV images, etc., the Kimpo Police Station is presumed to be a part of the cost of the building in the defendant's factory tent, but it is not possible to find out the origin of the building.

The possibility of the crime by fire prevention seems to be low, and there is no evidence evidence, so the fire department of the same kind of defect in the internal history of the defendant's factory: the fact that the fire is likely to occur due to the surrounding fire, etc. due to the fact that there is a difference between the statements of the related parties of the defendant's factory, and the adjacent entrance presumed to be the point of the fire is presumed to be the point of the fire extinguishment, and the opinion of the related agencies on the cause, etc. of the fire of this case is unclear, because the fire is damaged by the equipment of the refratator mobilized mobilized for the extinguishment of the fire, and the cause of the fire of this case is unknown.

(c)

The Plaintiff paid insurance money to D who suffered damage caused by fire of the instant insurance object, etc. due to the instant fire, etc., by April 24, 2019, KRW 158,090,763 as insurance money.

arrow