Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On August 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) obtained the victim’s bank identification number from the victim Nonparty B, a land owner, using a computer, etc.; (b) obtained the victim’s bank identification number from the Defendant’s bank account; (c) obtained the victim’s automatic cash payment, which was established at a 372-gil, 10,000 in 10,000,000,000 won deposited in the said account, by inserting the passbook and inserting the password without authority, and then transfer it to the Saemaul Bank’s account in the name of the Defendant; and (d) obtained property benefits equivalent to 68,00,000 won in total from around that time to January 30, 2018, as shown in the attached Table of Crimes, from around 12 times to January 30, 2018.
2. A thief, as described in the preceding paragraph, entered the passbook and entered the password at the cash payment time at the branch office in the Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, 1.5 million won in cash (1.0 million won around 15:37, 15:38, and 500,000 won around 15:38), and then cut off the victim’s property by withdrawing KRW 900,000 from the cash payment time at the place of action in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, 2018.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against B;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on transaction details;
1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and Article 347-2 of the Criminal Act (the fraud by using computers, etc.), Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;
1. An affirmative consideration shall be given to the Defendant’s given the following factors: (a) the first sentence of Article 37 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes; (b) Article 38 subparag. 1 subparag. 2; and Article 50 of the Act on the Punishment of Concurrent Crimes: (c) there has been no particular history of punishment for the latest twenty (20) years; and (d) the Defendant has expressed
However, the defendant is identical to the defendant.