A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, together with C, operated a field restaurant in the name of “E” in Sejong D.

The Defendant was aware of the victim in the course of conducting an on-site restaurant against the members of the 7 studio construction corporation in F and G, a nearby the above restaurant, and at the end of August 2013, the same year from the end of August 2013.

9. On the ground that the victim’s studio completed, the right to exclusively sell and lease the studio was demanded by the first police officer. However, the victim refused this request, and the defendant demanded again the victim to change KRW 6 million on the ground that the studio was used in the Defendant’s cafeteria in order to enter the said site, but the victim again refused this request, thereby causing the victim to have the studio.

1. Interference with business;

A. From October 9, 2013 to November 1, 201 of the same month, the Defendant: (a) parked I studio 7 new construction works sites in which the victim refused the Defendant’s demand as above; and (b) obstructed the victim’s duty of construction of the said 7 studio-dong construction works by force by leaving I studio 7 new construction works sites in which it is difficult for the Defendant to enter the said construction site; or (c) preventing the Defendant from carrying out on the said site the work using studs for materials.

B. On October 15, 2013, on the ground that the victim refused the Defendant’s request as above, the Defendant left a rash car at the said construction site to make it difficult for the Defendant to enter the construction site and enter the said site, or prevented the Defendant from constructing concrete studio construction works, thereby obstructing the victim’s 7-dong construction work by force.

C. At around 11:20 on October 21, 2013, the Defendant, at the above studio construction site, was a driving of JAS car on the ground that the victim refused the Defendant’s request as above.