beta
Text
The defendant is innocent.
Reasons
1. Around 08:00 on May 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had contact with the body of the victim on the ground that he/she was under drinking together with the victim at the room of the victim D (Inn, 38 years old); (b) had contact with the victim on the ground that he/she was under drinking together with the victim at the room of the victim D (Inn, 38 years old); and (c) had contact with the victim on the part of the victim, he/she had the face of the victim one time, and caused the victim’s injury on the part of the days of treatment.
2. Although the Defendant has consistently asserted that, as indicated in the facts charged in the instant case, there is no fact that the victim faces him/her, who seeks to return to his/her house from the investigative agency to this court, and the victim faces him/her, such as the victim’s face.
Although evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case has the victim's statements and the upper parts of the body, it is difficult to believe that each victim's statement is inconsistent as seen below, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize the facts charged and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.
1) The victim stated in this court that the time of occurrence of the crime was 3 p.m. o.m. other than the A.m. as stated in the facts charged. 2) The victim stated in the investigative agency that "the victim made a statement to the effect that "the defendant was able to leave his body and her body on the floor because she met it, the defendant was able to leave her body on the floor." The victim stated in this court that "the case was her body on the day, there is no fact that the defendant left her body, and the defendant's arms her body to return to her house were her body and her face was her drinking face."
3. On the other hand, the defendant asserts that "the victim who seeks to return to the house has a fact of frighting to prevent him from returning to the house" as above from investigative agency to this court, and the above defendant's assertion is alleged.