The defendant shall be innocent.

The defendant in the facts charged is a D major support in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, and E is a main room.

E around 18:30 on March 28, 2013, at the above D State room, the Defendant instructed the Defendant to hold a house while working for the Defendant, but the Defendant continued to hold the meeting to take the face of the Defendant, she was 5,6 times the Defendant’s face by taking the Defendant’s breath, her fating the Defendant’s bat, her fating the Defendant’s bat, leading the Defendant’s fat, leading the Defendant’s fat, and leading the Defendant to the outside.

피고인은 E의 폭행에 대항하여 E의 멱살을 잡고 주먹으로 E의 얼굴을 때리고 서로 바닥에 넘어져 뒹굴면서 E에게 약 6주간의 치료를 요하는 우수 제5수지 원위 지골 골성 망치 수지의 상해를 가하였다.

Judgment

E Whether the injury of the defendant was caused by the harmful act of the defendant.

The facts charged in this case state that the defendant's act caused injury to E in a comprehensive manner without expressly disclosing what act occurred in the dispute with the defendant.

However, from the investigative agency to this court, E stated that “The Defendant and the Defendant were fighting their body, and F, the captain, was satisfing in the middle and was trying to remove two persons. At that time, the Defendant’s satisfing sating satisfing sating satisfing, such as the right-defense defense action, and the Defendant’s satfing sating sat satfing sat, and satisfing satisfing.”

As long as E, unlike the facts charged, clearly specifies the causal relationship of the injury, whether the Defendant’s harmful act caused the same injury as the facts charged should be determined based on the E’s above statement.

However, in light of the following circumstances recognized in the records of this case, it is difficult to believe that E’s above statement is in fact, and the remaining evidence submitted alone is the harmful act of the defendant.