logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013. 10. 07. 선고 2013두11932 판결
선량한 관리자로서의 주의의무를 다하였다고 보기는 어려움[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2012Nu33609 (2013.05.08)

Title

It is difficult to see that he/she has fulfilled his/her duty of care as a good manager.

Summary

The Customer is an enterprise which has been accused of data on the basis of data, it is difficult to say that the Customer has fulfilled its duty of care as a good manager in purchasing oil which is less than the market price and receiving tax invoices, even though it is based on the abnormal distribution structure in the case of oil which is less than the market price.

Related statutes

Article 17 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

2013du11932 global income and revocation of disposition

Plaintiff-Appellant

CHAPTER A

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Namyang District Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2012Nu33609 Decided May 8, 2013

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

As the petition of appeal filed by the Plaintiff did not state any grounds for appeal and did not submit a statement of grounds for appeal within the statutory period, Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, Article 429 of the Civil Procedure Act, and Article 5 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal by the assent of all participating Justices

arrow