Each judgment of the court below shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Error of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles “constition” refer to “constition and talk” means “constition and talk”. In a situation where the Defendant was unable to know whether the victim was willing to reach an agreement, it merely intended to deliver and confirm the victim’s intent in conversations with the victim to verify that the Defendant did not intend to reach an agreement. The purpose of the interview is not to hold an interview. Even when the Defendant sought to find the victim as the company of the victim, he/she returned to the victim except the delivery of the meat as he/she was refused to request an interview with the victim, and the contents of the meat did not require an agreement or force an interview. The Defendant’s finding the victim’s residence on March 7, 2014 as his/her residence was about to only the victim, and the victim did not return to the victim, and thus, did not force the victim to reach an unfair sentencing sentence (Article 21-2).

B. It is true to send text messages to the victim, which are the same as the facts stated in the judgment of the court below, by mistake of facts in the case No. 2014No1000.

However, this is the difference between the defendant and the victim who was divingd around 2005, and the victim called several times through his workplace around 2007 or around 2008, and the defendant refused it. On September 2013, the victim called the victim to delete the defendant's phone number, and the victim called the victim to delete the defendant's phone number. However, the victim's telephone call from the male-child room of the victim's own, and the victim sent the above text message to the victim for this purpose.

This background is the same.