Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

around 01:46 around September 17, 2017, the Defendant handled the disturbance before the security room C, 104, and the case of reporting 112.

D Police E, a police officer affiliated with the Rab belt, was satisfing the shoulder of the police officer by hand while taking a bath, was satisfing him, and obstructed the performance of duties concerning the suppression of the crime of the police officer and the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes of F, G and H;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and the selection of a fine (including the fact that the police officer deposits KRW 500,000 for the sake of the victimized police officer, the police officer wanted his/her wife against the accused, his/her depth, reflects his/her anti-discrimination, and is an initial offender who has no record of criminal punishment, etc.);

1. The part concerning dismissal of public prosecution under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the detention in a workhouse

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) the victim F, who is the police officer belonging to the D District for about ten minutes at the above time and place, who is a public official of the D District police; (c) the victim F, who is a public official of the D District police.

The victim openly insultingd the victim by taking the desire, such as the fargue, which is not very difficult to be punished. The fargue fargue, etc.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records of this case, the facts that the victim revokes the complaint against the defendant after the indictment can be acknowledged. Thus, this part of the indictment is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.