The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

On October 7, 2020, the Defendant sent to the scene after receiving a report of 112 on the “taxing engineer and fee-related trial expenses” in front of the Busan East-gu, Busan-dong, Busan-dong, the Defendant asked the Defendant, a passenger of the taxi at the same police station C district unit, about the circumstances of the instant case. At the same time, the Defendant provided, without any justifiable reason, several years or years of social life to the said victims “Man several lives, and Man-gu, Man-gu, Man-si, Man-si, Man-si, and Man-si.”

The term “a fluort,” “a fluort fluor,” “a fluort fluort fluort fluort fluor,” and “a fluort fluore fluort fluor,” and “a fluort fluort fluort fluor,” openly insulting each victim.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act.

C. On January 8, 2021, the date of the prosecution of this case, the victims' withdrawal of complaint

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;