1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

ex officio, we examine the legitimacy of the instant lawsuit.

A lawsuit for confirmation of the authenticity of a deed is a lawsuit to confirm whether the document was forged or altered, unless it was prepared by the person in whose name the document was prepared, and to allow an independent lawsuit as to the confirmation of the fact, which is called the truth of the document, is based on the reason that the authenticity of the document becomes final and conclusive by a judgment, the dispute itself concerning the legal relations that the document is likely to be resolved or at least would contribute to the resolution of the dispute, as a result of the failure to dispute the authenticity of the document between the parties. Therefore, in order to legitimacy a lawsuit to confirm the authenticity of the document, there is a benefit to seek confirmation of the authenticity of the document.

(2) In light of the purport of the Plaintiff’s written evidence No. 1 and the overall purport of oral argument, the Plaintiff filed a request for disclosure of information on the receipt number of the case for which the Plaintiff filed a complaint against B without accusation at the original police station on December 2, 2010, the competent investigation investigator, the number of requests for replacement of the Plaintiff’s investigator, the result of handling the Plaintiff’s request for replacement of the investigator, and the head of the original police station on June 14, 2007 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 91Da15317, Dec. 10, 2007; 2005Da29290, Jun. 14, 2007). In full view of the purport of the Plaintiff’s written evidence No. 1 and the entire purport of oral argument, the Plaintiff filed a request with the head of the original police station for disclosure of information No. 1 and the purport of the information No. 2420, Dec. 27, 2010>