A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Criminal facts

[Criminal record] On February 20, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Jeonju District Court on September 9, 2015 and completed the execution of the sentence.

[2018 Highest 18.14:22 on May 7, 2016, the Defendant shown 4 of the C convenience points located in the Glurg group B, Glurg-gun, Glurg-gun, Glurg-gun, and displayed 4 of the C convenience day (4:00) to the victim D, who is an employee, and was given cash at this convenience point and purchased at this convenience point, and the point was exchanged with other products or returned.

A false statement was made to the effect that “the refund in cash is to be returned.”

However, it was true that the manufacturer of old products in traditional markets or Smarkets, etc. purchased old salt at its convenience store for the purpose of gaining the difference between the purchase amount and the refund amount, and it was not purchased at its convenience store.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received cash of KRW 128,00 from the victim, i.e., a refund from the victim, i.e., a cash of KRW 128,00, from the victim, from that time until April 6, 2018, by deceiving the victims on a total of 43 occasions, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, and obtained a total of KRW 4,441,30 from the victims and acquired it by deception.

[2018 Highest 2307] On December 26, 2017, at the F convenience store located in Seo-gu Busan, Busan on December 18:15, 2017, the Defendant shown three trokes day to the victim G, an employee, and “the purchase was made before one week, and the refund was changed.” However, on the face of the Defendant’s possession, the Defendant did not purchase at a convenience store as it was purchased at a salt price in advance in a conventional market near the discharge area for the purpose of obtaining the difference between the purchase price and the refund refund.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained cash 95,700 won from the victim to receive money from the victim for the purpose of a refund.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 1859]

1. The defendant's person;