logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.06.10 2016고단801
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 14, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and six months at the Incheon District Court for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and completed the execution of the said sentence on May 13, 2014.

1. From March 4, 2016, around 13:50 on March 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed theft by “E” managed by the victim C victim D in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, which was displayed in other stores; (b) 2 female typts worth KRW 84,800 at the market price, which was displayed in other stores; and (c) committed theft by putting the victim in bags with her own possession.

In addition, during the period from the above day to March 26, 2016, the Defendant stolen the damaged goods worth 336,600 won at the market price managed by the victims by the above methods four times in total, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

2. Fraud;

A. On March 4, 2016, at around 14:57, the Defendant viewed the victim’s “H” managed by the Victim G located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, as indicated in the foregoing 1. Paragraph, that “The Defendant viewed the victim as 2 punishment for female trts that stolen in E, as indicated in the foregoing 1.1., and that “the Defendant would refund things because of abnormal products purchased at home.”

However, the above women's tts 2 punishment was not refunded to the defendant's stolen goods.

The defendant received 84,800 won from the injured party and acquired it by fraud.

B. On March 26, 2016, around 15:20 on March 26, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant viewed the victim as “K” under the control of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government International Victim J, one set of clothes in female clothes that stolen from L, as described in the above 1.3.

However, in fact, one punishment of clothes in the above women was not returned to the defendant as a stolen object.

The defendant received 69,600 won from the injured party and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police statements made against M or N;

1. Each statement;

1. Each protocol of seizure and each investigation report (Evidence No. 20, 26, 27);

1.Each photograph; and

arrow