beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 5, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. in Seoul Eastern District Court on April 1, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Sungsung vocational training prison on April 1, 2012.
1. Larceny;
A. On October 23, 2012, around 19:39, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by taking advantage of the gaps of employees’ surveillance at the E convenience stores for the operation of the victim D located in Chungcheongnam-si; (b) 17,700 won of the market price owned by the victim; and (c) caused the theft of one set of 17,700 won of the market price.
B. On February 10, 2013, around 00:21, the Defendant: (a) took advantage of the gaps in employees’ surveillance at the H convenience store located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, the Sinnam-si, thereby thefting two sets of 2,200 won in total at the victim’s market price owned by the Defendant.
C. On March 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) took advantage of the gaps in the H convenience store in the operation of the JJ of the victim J, which was located in Gansi District I on March 16:18, 201; (b) caused the theft of 1 set of 23,000 won at the market price owned by the victim.
2. Fraud;
A. The defendant 1-B
In fact at the time and place indicated in paragraph (1), even though the Defendant stolen 2,200 won in total of the market price of the victim G, as seen above, the Defendant took the same attitude that he purchased one set of 1 set of 2 years old on the above Do day, and the Defendant demanded the employee to refund 1 set of 3 years old on the above Do day and received 24,100 won from the above employee immediately.
B. The defendant 1-C
In fact, even if the Defendant stolen one set of 23,00 won at the market price owned by the victim J, as above, at the time and place of the entry in the above paragraph, he took the same attitude that he purchased one set of 1 set of 3,000 won on the above Do day, and the Defendant demanded the above employee to refund 1 set of 1 set of Do-day on the above Do-day and immediately received 23,000 won from the above employee as the refund price of 1 set of Do-day on the above Do-day.
Summary of Evidence
1..