logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.01.26 2014가단250743
계약금반환
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 11,00,000 for Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 15,500,000 for Plaintiff B; and each of them, from November 27, 2014 to January 26, 2016.

Reasons

1. The following facts may be acknowledged, either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the arguments as a result of the fact inquiry into the new bank, or in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 evidence Nos. 1 and 3, Eul evidence Nos. 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 5, Eul evidence Nos. 6-1 and 6-2, witness D, and E, and each fact inquiry into the new bank.

Plaintiff

(1) On October 14, 2014, Plaintiff A and the Defendant leased the lease deposit of KRW 180,00,000 from the Defendant, Seo-gu G 116,000, and the lease deposit of KRW 100,000 from November 29, 2014 to November 28, 2016, Plaintiff A and the Defendant paid KRW 18,000,000 as the down payment on the date of the contract; KRW 162,00,000,00 as the remainder of KRW 10,000,00,000 to the Defendant for the remainder of KRW 10,000,00,000 as the remainder of KRW 10,00,00,000 (hereinafter “instant apartment”). At the time of the first lease agreement, the Defendant received 10,000,000,000 under the name of 10,000,000.

“The text message sent” and the down payment remains the remainder, even if it continued.

arrow