beta
Text
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
Reasons
1. Summary of the facts charged
(a) No person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. shall engage in the speculative business by using slot machines or speculative gaming machines, other than the speculative business;
Nevertheless, from January 2018 to May 28, 2018, the Defendant installed a 19-to-door game machine which is a speculative machine, 19-to-door game machine, 1-to-door game machine, and 7-ray (GARO) game machine at a game site where there is no trade name in Jinju-si B and 3 floors from May 28, 2018. The Defendant collected money from an unspecified customer who found the place and charged the points equivalent to 65 points per 10,000 won on the card, and then the customer puts the card into the said game machine and deducted the points of the game if he takes it back on the computer screen, then the Defendant made the game to obtain points equal to the amount corresponding to the picture appearing by chance.
Accordingly, the defendant was engaged in speculative activities using speculative gaming machines as a business.
(b) No person who violates the Game Industry Promotion Act shall provide game products for use which have not been rated as impeding the distribution order of game products, and exchange results of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products;
Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around April 14, 2018, set up a game room in the same place as that of paragraph (1) and operated the game room, without being classified at the same place as that of paragraph (1), had a customer called “C” play a game in the same manner as that of the commission, and exchanged KRW 330,000, an amount excluding 10% of the fee out of the points acquired by the said customer, from that time until May 27, 2018, the Defendant exchanged the total of KRW 15,430,000 in cash for 67 times in total, as shown in the attached list of crimes, from that time.
As a result, the defendant offers game products that have not been rated.