logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.03.28 2019고단558
사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. shall engage in the speculative business by using slot machines or speculative gaming machines, other than the speculative business;

Nevertheless, from October 8, 2018 to February 7, 2019, the Defendant installed at the second floor office of Busan, the 2nd floor, the Busan, the 2nd floor, and installed 13 games, the 40,000 won per three hours from an unspecified customer who found the place, and then, the Defendant, upon inserting KRW 10,000 to the ground disuse connected to the game machine, operated the game machine so that customers may put 65 times into the game, thereby having customers gain points as much as the amount corresponding to the game appearing by chance.

Accordingly, the defendant was engaged in speculative activities using speculative gaming machines as a business.

2. No person who violates the Game Industry Promotion Act shall provide a game product for use which has not been rated as impeding the distribution order of game products, and exchange such tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, set up 13 games, which did not receive a rating at the same time and operated a game room, had customers play the game as above, and exchanged the same in the manner of exchanging 20,000 won per 3-hour from the customers with the costs of KRW 40,000 and then deducting 10% of the charges per 4 points obtained without having to receive the cost of time from the customers.

As a result, the defendant provided game products not classified for use, and exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of C, D, E, F, G, and H;

1. Records of seizure;

arrow