The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violence;

A. On September 12, 2014, around 00:50, the Defendant assaulted the victim by booming the victim’s neck, b, and 301(B) at his own house of Seowon-gu, Seowon-gu, Seowon-gu, Cheongju on the ground that C, who was found in his house, was engaged in drinking and drinking.

B. On August 15, 2014, between 11:00 and 15:00, the Defendant: (a) committed a assault against the victim by booming a king boomed on the part of her house as indicated in the foregoing paragraph; and (b) assaulting the victim while fighting with the same issue as indicated in the said paragraph.

2. On September 4, 2014, from around 14:00 to around 18:00, the Defendant damaged the property by gathering TV with a set of TV set of TV set at the places indicated in the said paragraph, which had been fighting in the same manner as the said set at the places indicated in the said paragraph, thereby damaging the property by shouldering the schedule of the amount of TV on the repair cost and the marbling of TV on the repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of photographs);

1. Articles 366 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. A fine of one million won to be suspended of sentence;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. According to Article 59(1)(b) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence, there is a conflict between the Defendant and the injured party, which is the grounds for sentencing, and a divorce mediation was established smoothly between the Defendant and the injured party. At the time of the above conciliation, the injured party was willing to withdraw all criminal complaints against the accused, and the accused was a criminal offender and the accused being against the order shall be determined by taking into account all the circumstances.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.