The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, through the introduction of D, was only one time for the victim, and there was no conspiracy with D or not deceiving the victim, and there was no fact that the victim was received.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (fine 5 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case and the Defendant and D (hereinafter “Defendant, etc.”) known that the victim B is proceeding a civil suit against the Cbank, and have access to the victim, and had the Defendant, etc. committed a special relationship with the C Bank senior related persons of the C Bank, with the view to deceiving the victim and defrauding the money from the victim, as it can be seen that the Defendant, etc. agreed with the C Bank.

D) On November 2016, 2016, at the office of the victim in the third floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul E-building and at the office of G's branch located in the same Gu F, "I would have the victim divided into 5:5 if I would like to agree with the case currently pending C Bank and the case in the lawsuit with C Bank's related party," and "I would have a strong connection with the legal profession, and I would have a c Bank's officers and employees from the chairman of the Bank Trade Union and Labor Relations Commission in contact with IB." On November 201, 2016, I would have to appoint the victim with D on the introduction of D, "I would have to agree to do so only with C Bank head, etc.," and I would have to resign from the victim, and I would have to have the attorney-at-law appointed at the present time."

We can see the agreement.

(b)an attorney;