logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.09.27 2016고합180
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In June 2012, the Defendant divided the Defendant’s talk with the Victim F by introducing D, E, etc., which was frightly located in the insular coffee shop adjacent to the Busan Jin-gu C building in Busan, Busan, and then, the Defendant heard that: (a) the victim filed a complaint against G by borrowing KRW 260 million from G to him; and (b) the victim filed a complaint against G by fraud because he did not return it; and (c) the Defendant was subject to a non-prosecution disposition.

After doing so, the defendant has many legal persons to the victim, and there are many prosecutors and attorneys-at-law.

At the same time, “the method of filing a complaint has been distorted.”

In other words, if the appeal is lodged, it is favorable for the other party to receive a judgment, prepare documents so that the other party can be detained, and talk with the prosecutor and the lawyer.

may receive money with which the agreement to be bound is entered.

However, a false statement was made to the effect that, in order to have a prosecutor and an attorney-at-law enter into a sexual intercourse, the said person changed the amount of KRW 10 million as he/she requires money.

However, the defendant did not have many legal persons, and there was no knowledge of prosecutor or lawyer, and even if receiving money from the injured party and receiving the appeal case, there was no intention or ability to detain the other party or receive the agreed money from the other party by talking with the prosecutor and the attorney.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and stated the victim as "2015" in the official complaint of 2012. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it is evident that it is a clerical error in the "2012", and even if it is corrected, it is not likely to cause substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his right to defense. Thus, it is corrected ex officio.

6. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. He had E pay KRW 10,000 in cash with KRW 50,000,000,000 from the liquor house called I located in Busan-gu H, Busan-do, and received it through E.

Accordingly, the defendant is the victim.

arrow