Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, with the knowledge that the victim B is proceeding a civil suit against the C Bank, had access to the victim, and had the Defendants committed a special relationship with the C Bank senior relationship with the C Bank, with the view that the Defendants could be aware of the agreement with the C Bank, thereby deceiving the victim to defraud the money from the victim.

Defendant

D In the office of the victim in the third floor of the building in Gangnam-gu Seoul E in early November 2016 and the office of G in the same Gu F in the office of the victim in the same Gu F, “I would have the victim’s attorney-at-law, I would have agreed to this case at present with C Bank and a case in the lawsuit with C Bank, and 5:5 if I would receive a mutual agreement from the side of C Bank, I would have divided it into 5:5.” Not only is there a connection with a strong punishment to prevent the legal profession, but also C Bank from the chairman of the Bank Trade Committee.

Defendant A, as the introduction of Defendant D, shall make it possible for Defendant D to reach an agreement with Defendant D to reach an agreement on the victim’s “C Bank administration, etc.” with Defendant D at the H hotel in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Hamb on November 2016.

D If you are required to do so.

“Falsely speaks to the purport that “A” is false, and Defendant D must appoint an attorney-at-law appointed by the person who is aware of this direction to the victim “as the first attorney-at-law has become an I.D., and then the first attorney-at-law has been appointed.”

We can see the agreement.

The cost of attorney appointment was 3 million won, and the down payment was 1 million won.

However, in fact, Defendant D is not an attorney-at-law, and the Defendants did not have any intention or ability to agree with C Bank related persons in connection with a case in which the injured person is a party, and even if they received money from the injured person under the pretext of appointment of attorney-at-law, they were thought to use it as other investment funds of the Defendants.

The Defendants conspired to commit such an act in collusion with the victim.