1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 15, 2010, according to Article 7 of the Industrial Sites and Development Act, the outline of the project was changed to “F and D” due to the commencement of the project as of July 1, 2014 at the Cheongbuk-gun, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongbuk-si, Cheongbuk-gu, Cheongbuk-do as of July 1, 2014.

The original land was designated as E and publicly announced as E, and the main contents thereof are as follows:

1) Project name: E development project (hereinafter “instant project”);

(2) Location: 3,31,701 square meters in size: The president of the Chungcheong Development Corporation from 2007 to 5, 2015; the project operator of the project area of 3,331,701 square meters in size:

B. The Defendant’s implementation method of the plan for the establishment of relocation measures and the selection of a person subject to relocation measures on July 2014: (a) as a matter of principle, a person subject to relocation measures shall be supplied at 70% of the development cost on the basis of one parcel (165m265m2) per household only for a person subject to relocation measures for a migrants’s housing site; (b) as a matter of principle, a building owner who has continued to reside in a residential building from the date of public announcement of the designation of the E district (2) (2010m2, October 15, 2010) to the date of conclusion of the contract or the date of expropriation (Article 4(2)); and (c) a person subject to relocation measures shall be a person who has continuously owned a house located in the relevant project district from before the base date to the date of conclusion of the compensation contract or the date of expropriation (Article 6).

C. 1) The Plaintiff’s clan’s ground building (hereinafter “instant building”) in the Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu.

(2) The plaintiff's clan applied for the selection of a person subject to relocation measures to the defendant, but the defendant on February 11, 2015 is a clerical error in Article 6 (2) of the Rules for the Establishment and Implementation of Relocation Measures.