1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. In accordance with Article 7 of the Industrial Sites and Development Act, the outline of the project was changed to the address of “Yuk-gu I and F” following the commencement of the project as of July 1, 2014 by the Do governor of the Chungcheongbuk-do announced D through the notification of the C Chungcheongbuk-do.

The original land was designated and announced as “B complex” and the main contents thereof are as follows:

(i) Business name: B complex development project (hereinafter “instant project”);

(2) Location: 3,31,701 square meters in size: The president of the Chungcheong Development Corporation from 2007 to 5, 2015; the project operator of the project area of 3,331,701 square meters in size:

(b) A plan for the establishment of relocation measures and the public announcement of a plan for the selection of a person subject to relocation measures on July 2014: A building owner who continues to reside in a residential building from the date of public announcement of designation of a zone B (C) to the date of conclusion of a contract or the date of expropriation to the date of conclusion of a contract, in principle, is supplied at a price of 70% of the development cost on the basis of one parcel (165m265m2) per household (165m2) per household only for a person subject to relocation measures

C. On June 28, 2004, the Plaintiff’s ground-based housing (hereinafter “instant housing”) located in the Chungcheongbuk-gun (hereinafter “instant housing”) from G on June 28, 2004

(2) On July 13, 2004, the Plaintiff purchased the instant housing and filed a move-in report on the same day, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the said housing on July 13, 2004, and concluded a contract for consultation and sales with the Defendant on April 28, 2014. (2) The Plaintiff applied for the selection of a person subject to move measures, but the Defendant decided on February 11, 2015 against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff did not continuously reside in the instant housing from the date of the public notice of recognition of the instant project to the date of the conclusion of the contract or the date of the adjudication of expropriation (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, A(1) through (3)