(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.11.12 2015구합10686

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.11.12 2015구합10686

이주대책대상자제외처분취소

Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 15, 2010, the outline of the project was changed to the “J and K” due to the launch as of July 1, 2014 at the Cheongbuk-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongbuk-gu, Cheongbuk-do public announcement of the Industrial Sites and Development Act in accordance with Article 7 of the Industrial Sites and Development Act.

The original land was designated as F and announced as F, and the main contents thereof are as follows:

(i) Project name: G Project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”);

(2) Location: 3,31,701 square meters in size 4): The President of the Chungcheong Development Corporation from 2007 to 5, 2015:

(b) A plan for the establishment of relocation measures and the public announcement of a plan for the selection of a person subject to relocation measures on July 2014: A building owner who continues to reside in a residential building from the date of public announcement of designation of a F District for relocation measures (date of appraisal: 2010.15) to the date of conclusion of a contract or the date of expropriation, in principle, is supplied at a price of 70% at the development cost based on one parcel (165m2 to 265m2) per household only for a person subject to relocation measures for the supply of a housing site for migrants.

C. Plaintiff A is the owner of the building H ground (hereinafter “instant building”). Plaintiff B filed an application for the selection of a person subject to relocation measures with respect to each Defendant as the owner of the building I’s land (hereinafter “instant building”). On February 11, 2015, the Defendant decided on the Plaintiffs on February 11, 2015, on the ground that the Plaintiffs did not continuously reside in each of the instant building from the date the recognition of the instant project was announced to the date the contract was concluded or the expropriation was decided (hereinafter “each of the instant dispositions”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 to 4 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Each of the instant cases.

참조조문

-산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률 제7조

유사 판례

-청주지방법원 2015.09.17 2015구합10556

-청주지방법원 2016.02.18 2015구합11917

-청주지방법원 2015.10.29 2015구합10747

-청주지방법원 2015.11.05 2015구합10990

-청주지방법원 2015.12.17 2015구합11412