logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.20 2015나42589
약정금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. The first instance court accepted all of the part of the Plaintiff B’s claim for the agreed amount, which became final and conclusive as the Defendant did not appeal against this, the above part was excluded from the scope of the original trial.

2. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is that it is insufficient to admit the plaintiffs' assertion. The court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except that the court's 4th to 4th to 4th to 17th to 4th to 4th to 4th to 4th to 4th to 5th to 5th court's 4th to 5th court's 4th to 5th court's 4th to 5th court's 4th to

【The part of the contract of this case’s 【The following is that the commission fee for the plaintiffs’ products is paid to the plaintiffs according to the policies presented by the defendant company monthly. The above policy was changed from time to time in order to change the industry or encourage the sale of products, and the plaintiff’s side engaged in mobile phone sales business appears to have made a transaction with the defendant with full knowledge of the characteristics of the contract of this case’s 2013. ② The defendant company notified the plaintiff’s side of the contract of this case that the fee for the policy was paid to the plaintiff’s 6 months or longer and on the condition of normal opening, around September 2013. ③ Since the defendant company notified of the above conditions, the above conditions cannot be applied to the consignment contract between the plaintiff B and the defendant, on the other hand, even after the above conditions were notified, it can be evaluated that the above conditions were continuously traded with the defendant and it was incorporated into the consignment contract between the plaintiff A and the defendant company, ④ The entrustment contract of this case between the defendant company and the plaintiff was not maintained for six months or longer.”

3. Thus, the plaintiff A's claim and the plaintiff.

arrow