Text
1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s KRW 8,965,986 against the Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant) and KRW 6,772,774 against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).
Reasons
A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall be deemed to be combined.
1. The parties' assertion
A. The Plaintiffs asserted 1) E forged the Plaintiffs’ signature to enter into an insurance solicitation entrustment contract with the Defendant Company on March 9, 2012, and conducted insurance design business, such as soliciting policyholders to enter into an insurance contract with the Defendant. 2) The Defendant claimed against the Plaintiffs the payment of the insurance commission refund indicated in the separate sheet on the grounds of non-maintenance of the insurance contract through the notice of content certification on December 4, 2012 (hereinafter “the separate statement of this case”). However, the Plaintiffs did not enter into an insurance solicitation entrustment contract with the Defendant and did not carry out the insurance design business. Therefore, there is no insurance commission refund obligation against the Defendant.
B. On March 9, 2012, the plaintiffs entered into an insurance solicitation entrustment contract with the defendant on March 9, 2012. Even if the defendant forged the plaintiffs' signature and entered into an insurance solicitation entrustment contract with the defendant, the plaintiffs transferred the above money to E in accordance with E's order upon deposit of money in the passbook linked to the plaintiffs' insurance code, and such act constitutes ratification of the above entrustment contract. In addition, the plaintiffs used their insurance code to E, and the above act constitutes the name of the entrustment contract. 2) According to the above entrustment contract, if the reasons such as invalidity, termination, and cancellation of the insurance contract recruited by the plaintiffs occur, the relevant fee shall be refunded pursuant to the provisions of the defendant. According to the ratio of redemption with the defendant's consent or ratification, according to the agreement of the plaintiffs, each of the securities registration number column of this case entered in each of the instant specifications and the securities registration number entered into with the insurance policy holder on the date of entry in each of the instant specifications and the securities registration number entered therein.