1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff A, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "H" in Part 4, 13, 6, 7, 10, and 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as "A"; "Plaintiff G" in part 6, 7, 10, and 11 shall be deemed as "Plaintiff A"; "A. Determination as to the plaintiff's landscaping and wall construction cost claim" in part 7, and "Ma. Judgment" in part 9 shall be deemed as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except for each dismissal as follows. Thus, it shall be accepted as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts in height:

C. Determination on Plaintiff A’s landscaping and claim for the cost of fence construction 1) The occurrence of liability for damages, and the fact that the Defendant Company additionally executed landscaping and concrete fence construction to the Plaintiffs instead of not properly performing the instant construction contract (the instant agreement)

5. Of the terms and conditions of the agreement, there is no dispute between the parties that the defendant company failed to perform the above landscaping work and fence construction work. Thus, the defendants are obligated to compensate the plaintiff A for damages due to nonperformance in connection with the above landscaping work and fence construction work. 2) According to each description of Gap evidence 14-1, 2, and 3, it is reasonable to view the plaintiff A as 0.3, 16, 270, 000 won, and 620,000 won on October 18, 2017 to J, 200, 2000 won, 30.0,000 won, 20,000 won, 20,000 won, 18.0, 207, 208, 201, 30.7,000 won, 2,000 won, 208, 207, 2008.7, 2008, 2000 won, 200.7, 107,