(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2020.12.17 2020고단475

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2020.12.17 2020고단475

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around September 17, 2019, the fraud Defendant stated that “When he deposits KRW 600,000 per unit KRW 300,000,000 per unit deposit to the victim D, he/she would deliver a flab cover color, red bags within two weeks.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, the defendant did not have the intent to use the shopping mall operating expenses, and did not have the intent or ability to buy the bank like the promise of the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 60,000 won from the victim to the F account (G) in the name of E, the mother of the Defendant on the same day.

2. On January 9, 2020, the Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official documents presented his/her driver’s license as the Defendant’s license in the name of the Commissioner of the Gyeonggi-do Police Agency, the Defendant, who was summoned in the office of Pyeongtaek-si Police Station, the office of cyber criminal investigation team, and the Defendant was summoned in the case of fraud as referred to in paragraph (1) and was investigated by him/her, and presented his/her official document to the police officer, who was in possession of the Defendant’s female student, as the Defendant’s driver’s license.

3. Around January 17:35, 2020, the Defendant presented the H’s driver’s license as indicated in paragraph (2), and as indicated in paragraph (2), forged H’s name in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol, and used the suspect interrogation protocol containing a forged signature for the purpose of exercising the signature and signature, and issued it to police officers without knowledge of the circumstances.

Summary of Evidence

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police in relation to the defendant's statement E (second time);

1. Investigation report of D Police’s written statement (for misappropriation of other persons’ personal information) to the contents of conversation, the remittance statement, and the protocol of interrogation of suspects (Evidence No. 17 No. 5).

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.08.21 2015고단850

-의정부지방법원 2013.06.13 2012고단3138

-춘천지방법원 속초지원 2019.02.13 2018고단181

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.01.04 2012고단918

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.12.10 2015고정560