Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,00,000.

Defendant

C The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is the Chairperson of the Police Police Development Committee of the J police Station who operates a single cafeteria in the name of “K”.

On June 30, 2009, the Defendant received KRW 30 million from N, who was the president of the MM (hereinafter “the instant association”) and the head of the said association, and the head of the N, who operated illegal gambling entertainment rooms in the Eunpyeong Police Station in Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, and Japan, to the investigation of acceptance of bribe against Defendant B, and received KRW 30 million upon request from N, to the effect that the police crackdown on the illegal gambling entertainment rooms operated by N is inconsistent with the request for the investigation of acceptance of bribe against Defendant B.

The Defendant received a total of KRW 80 million from B and N in total five times from June 2009 to August 2009, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, including the above crimes.

As a result, the Defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting or arranging the case or affairs handled by the public officials.

2. Defendant C, around July 19, 2007, at a restaurant in which it is impossible to know the trade name in the Gyeyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Goyang-gu. Around July 19, 2007, Defendant C, as the chairperson of the committee of promoters, recommended B, who was in general in charge of the overall duties of the committee of promoters, to allow B to take out the removal construction upon the commencement of the project, and issued KRW 10 million in cash as compensation to B.

B was elected as the president of the instant association at the inaugural general meeting of the partnership on October 30, 2007, and on January 23, 2008, after obtaining authorization for the establishment of the said association from the Eunpyeong-gu Office, completed the registration of incorporation on March 13, 2009.

Accordingly, the defendant made a solicitation related to the selection of the removal company to B who is a public official, and offered a bribe to B, which became the head of the association of this case who is a public official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants and the above Defendants B’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's office for Q, N and R.