logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.07.23 2015나1646
임금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. On August 9, 201, the defendant, who runs a collective housing management business on the ground of the plaintiff's claim, concluded an entrustment management contract with the council of occupants' representatives (hereinafter "the council of occupants' representatives of this case"), and entrusted the above apartment from September 1, 201 to August 31, 201; the plaintiff performed the above apartment management business from June 1, 201 to November 30, 201 as security guards belonging to the defendant; the defendant did not have an obligation to perform cleaning business for the period of 20 days after June 6, 2012 and September 2, 2012; the defendant did not have an obligation to pay the plaintiff the difference between the minimum wage rate of 109,600,000 won (the average wage rate of Grade 4,580 won) and the minimum wage rate of 20,000 won (the minimum wage rate of Grade 4,580,000,000 won). The defendant did not pay the plaintiff's average wage rate of 14 hours from 2.

2. The defendant's assertion was determined and executed by the council of occupants' representatives of this case, and the employee's earned income tax was withheld and paid as a withholding agent under the Income Tax Act, and the employee's four-party insurance was subscribed to and paid the premium.

arrow