logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원(전주) 2019.01.14 2018누1775
건축물용도변경불허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. As to this case, the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance shall state "No. 4" as stated in Part 4 below as "No. 4 and 6 evidence No. 4," and as stated in Part 1, No. 5 as "former Building Act (wholly amended by Act No. 14935, Oct. 24, 2017; hereinafter "the Building Act")" and Part 9, No. 20 as "former Building Act (wholly amended by Act No. 14935, Oct. 24, 2017; hereinafter "No. 208 of the Enforcement Decree of the Building Act"), and No. 20 as "the former Enforcement Decree of the Building Act (wholly amended by Presidential Decree No. 28397, Oct. 24, 2017; hereinafter referred to as "the former Enforcement Decree of the Building Act prior to the partial amendment by Presidential Decree No. 28197, Oct. 24, 2017")"

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow