logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.10.23 2020누41209
조합원 지위확인
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The contents asserted by the plaintiff citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the court of first instance. Thus, even if the plaintiff's assertion is reviewed by considering the evidence submitted by the court of first instance and the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the

Therefore, this court's reasons to be stated in this judgment are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following parts. Thus, this court's reasoning is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Article 16 of the Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 30146, Oct. 22, 2019); Article 2 of the Housing Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 15719, Aug. 14, 2018); and Article 7 of the Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29269, Oct. 22, 2019); and Article 12 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29269, Oct. 22, 2019) shall be construed as “former Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29269, Oct. 22, 2019)”.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed for reasons.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow