A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The criminal facts were partly corrected according to the facts recognized within the extent that does not actually disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her defense right.

The Defendant is a person who was a member of the committee for the management of apartment complexes in Busan Dongdong-gu C (hereinafter “instant apartment”), and the victim D is a person who was the chairperson of the instant apartment occupant’s representative meeting from August 26, 2014 to July 1, 2016.

1. On May 27, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) at the Defendant’s residence located in Busan Dongdong-gu C, 103 Dong-dong 504 around May 27, 2016, and on the Internet bulletin board of the instant apartment website for the purpose of slandering the victim through the information and communications network, the Defendant “E” as the clinic of “E” on the bulletin board of the freedom of website of the instant apartment site, and “the construction of the US Seowon-gu store facility” was written by the president, or is extracted from a list or a list on which the president written comments on the comments.

I will be able to become the same in the Kingdom, us, and in any further place.

“The day” and “the day” have absolute loss and had the staff of the management office.

“.....”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly duplicating facts through information and communication networks with a view to slandering the victim.

2. Violation of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc., by falsity.

A. On June 1, 2016, at around 21:24, the Defendant, at the same place as the instant apartment security service company, did not have committed unlawful acts, such as receiving several entertainments from security service companies during the process of selecting the instant apartment security service company, but did not, on the information and communications network, slandered the victim through the information and communications network. In order to slander the victim, “E” is called “E” on the bulletin board of the instant apartment website, and “the Defendant was provided with related companies v. S. and entertainment prior to the bid,” written by the Defendant.