The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Of note 14.51g of seized philophones, No. 1.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

A. 1) Grounds for misunderstanding of facts (Article 1 of the facts stated in the judgment of the court below) The Defendant did not agree to import the instant penphone from the name in the Thailand and the name in the Thailand. The Defendant’s attached documents, such as a certified copy of resident registration, were sent in Thailand. The Defendant requested F to receive the affixed international mail instead. As such, the Defendant merely requested F to receive the enclosed phone, the international mail under paragraph (1) of the facts constituting the crime at the time of the original judgment with the concealment of the penphone (hereinafter “international mail of this case”).

(2) In addition, the Defendant did not know that the instant international postal item contains philophones. (2) The Defendant did not administer philophones. (2) The Defendant did not have any fact that philophones were administered, and as a result of frequently taking drugs, such as philograms, the Defendant’s reaction to train Melogramscopic ingredients in the Defendant’s urine.

B. The lower court’s imprisonment (four years of imprisonment) on the ground of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

Before making a judgment on the grounds for appeal ex officio, it is obvious that the following facts are recorded.