logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.11.13 2012가단218894
구상금
Text

1. The Defendants’ respective Plaintiff KRW 6,605,898, as well as 5% per annum from June 9, 201 to November 13, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 22, 2009, C is an employee employed on the Hyundai Sign Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the present representative site”), and around 10:30 on December 22, 2009, C was carrying out the installation of bridge and draining equipment by boarding the D complaint vehicle operated by Defendant A (hereinafter “instant complaint vehicle”) at the construction site of the Innyang-Yyang-Syang National Expressways located in the Enyang-Syang-Syang National Expressways located in which modern marks were contracted to perform the construction. However, as the cost for filing the complaint of the vehicle was transferred, C was crashed at a height of 16 meters above the ground (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. C was injured by the instant accident, “A, etc., of the pressure frame No. 12 pressure frame, the right upper alley, the right upper alley, the right upper alley, the right upper alley, the right upper alley, the right upper alley, the left chill, the left chill, the left upper chill, and the discharge chills No. 1.”

C. By June 8, 2011, the Plaintiff recognized the injury suffered by C from the instant accident as an occupational accident, and paid C medical care benefits of KRW 8,597,220, temporary layoff benefits of KRW 16,68,960, disability benefits of KRW 36,536,50 to C.

(hereinafter referred to as “victim”)

D. Defendant B is the owner of the instant accusation vehicle and the Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Hyundai Sea”) is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with Defendant B regarding the instant accusation vehicle.

E. The Defendant Hyundai Sea paid medical expenses of KRW 13,631,460 to the victims.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 2's evidence 1, Gap 3's evidence 1 to 3, the whole purport of pleading

2. Liability for damages and occurrence of the right of indemnity;

A. (1) According to the above facts and the above evidence, the defendant A should maintain the vehicle driving before driving so that it does not lose balance in the cost of the accusation work attached to the vehicle in the accusation work before driving, as well as pay attention to the failure to shaken or transfer the cost of the accusation work on which the victim is aboard.

arrow