1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,860,00 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from April 1, 2014 to May 28, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is an enterprise leasing a motor vehicle for accusation, and the defendant is an insurer who has entered into an insurance contract for a motor vehicle for the plaintiff's accusation vehicle with the plaintiff (one personal compensation and two personal compensation).

B. On May 19, 2012, the Plaintiff was engaged in the work of leasing a vehicle for accusation (vehicle No. B) with A, an engineer of the Plaintiff, with the Korea-Sag glass Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea-Sag glass”) around May 201. On May 19, 2012, the Plaintiff was killed and injured by C, who was on board, due to the collapse of the ground below the height of the vehicle for accusation work conducted by A, thereby falling into the floor.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

C was diagnosed with 14 days before the catitis, the catum satum, and the satum catum to the datum satum in the hospital on the same day.

C During the period from May 21, 2012 to December 26, 2013, C received outpatients from D Hospital, E Hospital, Fentsium, and G oriental medical hospital for a total of 249 days.

E. The Defendant paid 9,252,269 won to C or each of the above hospitals during the above opening period.

F. On the other hand, on June 18, 2012, Korea-Japan agreed to KRW 20,000,000, including all the expenses for the treatment expenses and personnel expenses incurred from the instant accident, and agreed to the agreement that it does not raise any objection to all matters, such as subsequent disability and medical expenses, and paid KRW 20,000,000 to C, and deducted the above KRW 20,000,000 from the rent for the accusation work, etc. to be paid to the Plaintiff.

G. At present, the injury grade C recognized by the Defendant is grade 8, and the number of days of suspension of business is 14 days.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence No. 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff paid KRW 20,000,000 to C, which is the insurer of the Plaintiff’s complaint work vehicle, according to the instant accident, after paying the Plaintiff’s automobile accident compensation amount to be paid to C, the Plaintiff finally pays the Plaintiff’s automobile accident compensation amount.