beta본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.09.05 2016고단666
도로법위반
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. A, an employee of a specific defendant in the facts charged, a violation of restrictions on vehicle operation at the 2nd of August 16, 2006, the National Highway No. 2, Samho-gun, Samho-ho, Samho-ho, Samho-ho, Samho-si's Sub-control Team
2. The Criminal Procedure Act applicable to a summary order subject to review has retroactively lost its effect according to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality, and thus, the Defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.