logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.06.30 2016고단361
도로법위반
Text

Defendants shall be acquitted respectively.

Reasons

1. The specification of the facts charged

A. Violation of restrictions on the operation on vehicles in front of the business establishment of the Corporation at a point of 58.14 km on August 7, 2007, 13:48 of A, an employee of the 2016 Highest 361 Defendant, at a point of 58.14 km on the west coast Highway, which is an employee of Defendant 361

(b) A violation of restrictions on the operation of vehicles on the two lines of the national highways located in Hoho-gun, Nam-gun, Eup, Maho-gun, Nam-gun, 2016 at around February 9, 2009, which is an employee of the defendant 505 Godan 505.

C. Violation of restrictions on the operation of vehicles at C’s control offices located in the Eup/Myeon located in the Southern Cancer-gun No. 29 on October 15, 2005, around 09:29 on October 15, 2005, which is an employee of 506 high group of Defendant 2016;

2. Since punishment laws applicable to each summary order subject to review have lost effect retroactively according to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality, each of the defendants shall be acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow