beta본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.10.28 2016재고단9 (1)
도로법위반
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. A’s violation of the restriction on vehicle operation on February 3, 2004, which is an employee of the defendant specified in the facts charged, around 16:14;
2. The Criminal Procedure Act applicable to a summary order subject to review has retroactively lost its effect according to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality, and thus, the Defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.