logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.05.13 2014나54382
손해배상(기) 등
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an autonomous management body composed of occupants for the management of the 722 apartment complex of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 670 Gangwon-dong, Gangdong-gu, 70 Gangwon-gu, 9 apartment complex of 722 households of 722 (five units of 5 units in sale, 290 units of 4 units of lease, and 432 units of lease units; hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment complex”).

B. The Defendant is a project undertaker who constructed and sold the instant apartment, and the Defendant’s Intervenor was a contractor who subcontracted part of the construction work of the instant apartment from the contractor or contractor of the instant apartment, and the approval for use of the instant apartment was completed on July 13, 2009.

C. The Defendant’s Intervenor’s non-execution, alteration construction, and defective construction caused defects, such as equal heat, in the section for exclusive use and section for common use of the instant apartment, and the instant apartment still remains attached to the instant apartment despite the Plaintiff’s demand for repair, even though some repair was

1. The expenses (based on two times the partial design of the same heat) incurred in repairing any defect in the table of totalization by defect list, in which there remain the same defects as that in the table of totalization by defect list, are as follows:

After sectional pre-use inspection, 363, 19, 254, 279, 367, 297, 364, 367, 379, 367, 478, 297, 367, 367, 367, 479, 478, 367, 367, 368, 367, 360, 479, 478, 297, 367, 479, 297, 367, 298, 47, 1967, 298, 367, 297, 1962, 360, 1962, 965, 367, 287, 286, 287, 287, 297, 2787, 2967, 2787

D. The plaintiff filed the lawsuit of this case from the date of filing the application to the date of filing the application for modification of the purport of the claim of this case, 272 households of the apartment sales household of this case.

arrow