logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.18 2013가합58915
손해배상(기) 등
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 522,001,841 to the Plaintiff; and (b) 5% per annum from June 27, 2014 to September 18, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts are autonomous management organizations composed of occupants for the management of 722 units of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 670 Gangwon-dong apartment complex 722 units of Gangdong-dong 770 [5 units of sale, 290 units of sale, 4 units of lease, 432 units of lease, and below hereinafter “instant apartment”).

The defendant is the project undertaker who constructed and sold the apartment of this case, and the defendant joining the defendant is the contractor of the apartment of this case.

The approval for use of the apartment of this case was made on July 13, 2009.

Due to the non-execution, modified construction, and defective construction of the Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s defects such as rupture

Despite the fact that part of the remuneration was paid upon the plaintiff's request for repair, the detailed contents of defects still exist in the apartment of this case are the same as the statement of the '2. Consolidated Table by Defect List' of the appraiser on July 21, 2014.

However, the following 2.1

Items that are not recognized as having caused defects within the warranty liability period, as seen in the above, shall be excluded;

) There is 3. The sum of expenses for repairs of the instant defects (as stated in the table below 2, 307, 197, 197, 195, 619, 471, 471, 314, 597, 697, 868, 107, 107, 297, 297, 297, 297, 397, 297, 297, 297, 397, 297, 297, 1967, 1967, 197, 297, 397, 297, 1066, 367, 102, 363, 1063, 107, 3105, 7015, 315, 360, 3785, 297, 29748

arrow