1. The defendants jointly and severally set up to the plaintiff 67,720,00 won, the plaintiff B, andC each amount of KRW 16,80,000,000, and each amount of money on June 16, 2016.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant D’s representative director of Defendant I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”), Defendant F’s inside director, Defendant G, and H of the Defendant Company; Defendant J’s representative director of Taean Center Co., Ltd. holding shares in the Defendant Company; and K’s former representative director of Taean Corporation Co., Ltd. holding shares in the Defendant Company; and Defendant E and Thailand.

B. Around December 2014, the above K invested in the business of the sewage terminal treatment facility in Thailand to Defendant E, but the investment amount of KRW 130 million was not paid due to failure of the business, and around that time, the Defendant E was able to pay money for the business with a contract received from the head of Thailand. Around that time, the above K was in contact with Defendant D who had invested in the multi-level program, and requested to introduce Defendant E’s business and raise funds.

C. After that, around March 2015, Defendant D introduced the above K, with the explanation that Defendant E will receive a project from Defendant E through the expenses to the government-related parties of Thailand in the coffee shop located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Defendant D recommended investment in the above project, using the program “M” created by applying the “L” program that was known in the course of performing other similar fund-raising activities before raising the said investment amount, and planned to acquire and receive part of the investment amount by paying it to Defendant E and the above K, and the remaining investment amount by receiving the investment amount by means of the so-called return prevention revenue in order to show that the business is normally conducted.

Then, on April 2015, Defendant D demanded the PTPP data related to the Roto business to attract investors to Defendant E through the above K on early April 2015, and Defendant E around that time provided Defendant D with the aforementioned data.