Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is the current representative director of the “Criart” in Gyeonggi-gu B.
1) On December 6, 2015, the Defendant called the victim D (56 years old) at a non-permanent place on December 6, 2015, and inform the victim D (56 years old) of “any person or entity about D with respect to all affairs in the family,” and the person D’s attachment to E no longer than anything else.
“Intimidating the victim”, the victim was threatened.
2) On December 12, 2015, the Defendant called the victim at an insular place, and called the victim for “Iskn't have to leave if Iskn's kn's kn't.
Epronrona frienda
내가 지금 말이 뻥 같아. 너 잡아넣는다는 거. ”라고 말하여 피해자를 협박하였다.
3) 피고인은 2015. 12. 13. 불상의 장소에서 피해자에게 전화하여 “ 도둑 놈 집단이지, 그게 뭡 니 까 수사만 해서 먹고 사는 사람이라고 눈치만 바도 안다고 내가. ”라고 말하여 피해자를 협박하였다.
4) On January 2016, the Defendant did not attend the Defendant’s office in F, C, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, to the Defendant.
(e) need not be made;
The victim threatened the victim, i.e., “at the end of raising the hands.”
2. We examine the judgment, and the above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent in accordance with Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.
On November 14, 2016, after the prosecution of this case, the victim D withdrawn his wish to punish the defendant.
Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.