Each public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. Defendant A, from around 20:30 on December 31, 2016 to around 21:00 on the grounds that the victim C reported the Defendant to the police in the instant case, he called the victim to the victim on the ground that he reported the Defendant to the police during the instant case, and “I am at night, width, I am at the time, I am at the point of view, I am at the point of view, I am at the point of view, I am at the point of view, and I am at the point of view, I am at the point of view, but I am at the point of view, but I am at

The victim threatened the victim, i.e., “I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling,” etc.

Defendant

B The Defendant called the above victim C on the date, time, place, as described in paragraph 1, and on the above grounds, and threatened the victim with the victim, such as “I am spherbp, C spherb, I am spherb, I am spherb, I am spherb, I am spherb, I am spherb, I am spherb, I am am spherb, and I am am spherb, and if you are more likely to report, I am spherb, and the criminal

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act.

C. The expression of intention not to punish: May 11, 2018, which was after the prosecution of the instant case, the letter of agreement, including the expression of intent not to punish the Defendants of the victimized person, was made to the court.

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;