The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the court below acquitted the defendant of the facts charged of this case, it erred in the misapprehension of facts and affected the conclusion of the judgment, despite credibility in the statement of the witness examination record against the defendant in the Ulsan District Court 2014, 1470 case, and the victim's consistent statement on the contents of conversation between the defendant and the victim, etc.

2. Determination:

A. On January 15, 2014, the summary of the facts charged of the instant case: (a) at the Defendant’s house located in Ulsan-gu C and 302, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, 18:00, the Defendant: (b) examined the Defendant’s her husband’s son D (37 years of age) who is the Defendant’s husband’s cell phone, and did not return the Defendant’s Kakao Stockholm message stored in the Defendant’s cell phone; and (c) threatened the Defendant with a knife, which is a dangerous object in the main line, by threateninging the Defendant as they were

B. The lower court: (a) filed a complaint with the police on April 10, 2015 to the effect that the victim’s accusation, recording copy, and recording book of the witness examination (Ulsan District Court 2014, 1470, hereinafter referred to as the “Flsan District Court”); (b) the victim submitted to the police on April 10, 2015, a written complaint to the effect that “the victim knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif k knif knif knif kn.