Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a veterinarian who operates C Hospital in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do.

The defendant was proposed to issue a false diagnosis in the name of sick person who can receive insurance money in order to obtain insurance money from livestock owners with 50% of the government subsidies.

On October 04, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 4,145,940 from E, the owner of the farm located in Pyeongtaek-si, to pay the insurance proceeds of KRW 4,145,940, in total three times, as in the list of crimes, by issuing a false diagnosis statement stating the number of this ticket and 50,000 won of diagnosis expenses, and the injury for which the payment of livestock disaster insurance proceeds can be made, despite the fact that the Defendant was normal, from E, the owner of the farm located in Pyeongtaek-si D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Recording notes of the examination of the witness with respect to G and A (2014, 594, c. c.)

1. Recording notes of the examination of a witness to H, who is a police officer of the investigation (2014, No. 594, Jun. 1, 2014);

1. Each medical certificate and contract for sale and purchase;

1. A written claim for payment of insurance proceeds;

1. Each beef history system (the Defendant directly treated non-permanent cattle and diagnosed them with bathing or stoke, and claimed that his diagnosis is not false, as the milk immediately before slaughter could occur normally.

However, according to the above evidence, it is impossible to slaughter in normal cattle after the childbirth, because the milch cows, which became unusable due to the lack of calcium or the milch cattle, was immediately moved to the slaughterhouse and was slaughtered in normal cattle, and the milch cattle, the bones of which was cut off, is slaughtered in normal cattle that occurs on the day immediately.

G is diagnosed as non-a non-permanent cattle in need of slaughter, not immediately slaughtered and requested to slaughter 5 days after being brought by the small sales business operator. However, if the normal lawsuit is not done, G, the seller of the small-scale cattle, has no reason to go to 5 days of the milk, and G is diagnosed as non-a non-permanent cattle by avoiding a little point of view.