logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.08.25 2014고정632
축산물위생관리법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who operates a stock farm in Gyeonggi-si C.

On May 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) obtained a false diagnosis from a veterinarian E on May 19, 2012, stating that he/she is an injury for the reason of paying insurance money; and (b) prepared a sales contract that he/she sold KRW 100,000 to a non-permanent cattle (beak) and to a buyer who is a small seller, to submit it to a damaged private person B on May 2012, and that he/she received KRW 2,036,160 from the damaged insurance company on March 16, 2012, including that he/she receives KRW 18,239,250, as shown in the attached Table 18, such as that he/she receives KRW 2,250,00 from the damaged insurance company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Recording notes of the examination of the witness in relation to F and E (2014, 594, both of which are party members of the ordinary housing site);

1. Recording notes of the examination of the witness to G, who is the police officer of the investigation, (2014, No. 594, Jun. 1, 201)

1. Copy of the police statement made to H;

1. Each medical certificate and contract for sale and purchase;

1. A written claim for payment of insurance proceeds;

1. Each beef history system [the defendant, at the time of the diagnosis by a doctor, milch cattle was non-permanent at the time of the diagnosis by a doctor, at the time of the diagnosis by a doctor, at the time of the diagnosis by a doctor, at the time of the diagnosis by a doctor, the medical certificate received by the defendant is not false, nor is it possible to obtain insurance money by fraud.

However, according to the above evidence, the milch cows of the defendant, which was slaughtered in normal cattle, was diagnosed as not influent with the pellet, the scam sprink, and the spam sprink, and was diagnosed as necessary to spambling, and the above sprinks were slaughtered on the date of the diagnosis, and all were slaughtered in normal cattle after 2 days from the date of the diagnosis, and the diagnosis was not submitted immediately before the slaughter.

arrow