logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.06.09 2016고단383
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The charge of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act is acquitted. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 25, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment by the Cheongju District Court for interference with the performance of official duties, etc. on November 27, 2015, and was sentenced to ten months by imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual assault) at the Cheongju District Court on November 27, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Cheongju District Court on February 15, 2016.

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On February 19, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s work on February 19, 2016, 2016: (a) found the victim D (63 taxes) located in Cheongju-si C in Cheongju-si C in a drunken-si; (b) found the victim’s “sing practice place” under the influence of alcohol; (c) caused the Defendant to escape from disturbance on the floor of the Cheongju-si; and (d) caused the Defendant to put the customers up on the floor.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the singing business of the victimized person by force.

B. On February 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) found the Defendant under influence of alcohol in the “singinging practice place” operated by the victim D, such as the written claim No. 1 at around 21:45, Feb. 21, 2016; and (b) avoided disturbance in the same manner as the written claim No. 1 at paragraph (a).

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the singing business of the victimized person by force.

(c)

On February 25, 2016, the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance in the same manner as described in paragraph 1(a), while searching in “singing practice place” operated by the victim D, as described in paragraph 1(a), around February 25, 2016.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the singing business of the victimized person by force.

(d)

On February 27, 2016, the Defendant was unable to bring an disturbance in the same manner as described in paragraph 1(a), while searching in “singing practice place” operated by the victim D, as described in paragraph 1(a), around February 27, 2016.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the singing business of the victimized person by force.

E. On March 4, 2016, the Defendant interfered with one’s business on March 4, 2016, at a restaurant operated by the Victim F (43) in Heung-gu E (43) on March 4, 2016, the Defendant “F (43 years old)” in the cafeteria operated by the Victim F (43 years old).

“....”

arrow