logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.01.10 2016고단1133
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is the secretary of C Steering Committee to forge a private signature.

C An ordinary general meeting shall be held in June of each year, and in such cases, the operating committee shall complete one year's expenditure statement before the ordinary general meeting and report it to members at the ordinary general meeting with approval from auditors.

Although the defendant was at an ordinary general meeting, the auditor D, E, and F of the C Steering Committee requested re-approval by supplementing documents, the defendant was willing to forge and submit a letter of approval for audit and inspection of the report on settlement of accounts in the name of C Steering Committee to be submitted to the regular general meeting.

On June 2015, the Defendant created additional signature column for audit and inspection of accounts in the column for approval of audit and inspection of accounts in the name of C Steering Committee to be submitted to the C Steering Committee in the territory of the C Steering Committee to the C Steering Committee at the end of 2015, and copied it in the column for approval of audit and inspection of accounts in the year 2015, after setting up D and E’s signature portion of each signature in the report of accounts in the name of C Steering Committee.

After all, the defendant puts his signature D, E, and F respectively for the purpose of exercising the right.

2. On July 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) submitted a false statement of accounts under the name of the C Governance Committee in the year 2015, stating the signatures of D, E, and F, at the ordinary meeting of the second floor of the C Management Office in Changwon-si, Changwon-si; and (b) exercised each forged signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 239 of the same Act on the criminal facts) and Article 239(2) and Article 239(1) of the same Act on the criminal facts (the point of exercising the above investigation’s signature);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution (see, e.g., the violation of the instant crime, the violation of any criminal record, the violation of any criminal record, and the violation of Article 62(1));

arrow