Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as the Secretary General of the F Organizing Committee, is the Secretary General of the F Organizing Committee, one of nine evaluation members for the selection of service providers for the opening and closing of the “F” which is the best common share at E and Posting.

1. At around 15:00 on July 24, 2014, a tendering procedure was conducted for the selection of service providers for the F- or closed event event event with the participation of four service companies.

The nine evaluation committee members assessed each company's service proposal under the state that the submission company is not open to the public, and as a result of the calculation of evaluation points, G, the port area company, was selected as the above service company.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with H, who is the head of the domestic business team of E and the head of the sports support headquarters of the above Organizing Committee, had been able to modify the evaluation table in order to ensure that the Plaintiff is selected as the above service provider with the experience of participating in the event of E.

On July 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 18:50 on July 24, 2014, at the “K Hotel” parking lot located in the Northern-guJ, Northern-si; (b) from the Plaintiff, the general team leader L of the administrative support headquarters in charge of keeping the original evaluation list through H, and received the original evaluation list for the Plaintiff, as an evaluation committee member, prepared by the Defendant.

After confirming that the evaluation score is 42 points, the Defendant: (a) indicated in the evaluation sheet form without any indication as 51 points in the evaluation score sheet; (b) stated the evaluation score in the change as 51 points; (c) made L to select the same evaluation score as a service provider for the said opening and closed-type event; and (d) made L to report the results of the selection to the victim M, who is the chairperson of the Organizing Committee, according to the evaluation score changed as above.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with H, interferes with the selection of the service company for the victim M's M through a fraudulent means, and at the same time, tenders for the selection of the service company.