logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.08.21 2019나2007028
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. Of the appeal costs, the part arising between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and each evidence submitted in the court of first instance is deemed legitimate even if each evidence submitted in the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, this court's reasoning is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for partial revision or deletion as follows. Thus, this court's reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

On the third side of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "Plaintiff" in the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be "Defendant", and the "Defendant" shall be deemed to be "Defendant".

Each "Witness M of Witness" in the 4th, 7, 8, and 5th and 3th of the judgment of the first instance court shall be considered as "M of the first instance court witness" respectively.

Part 5, Chapters 19 through 6, shall be deleted from the judgment of the first instance.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow